新睿云创办于2017年的云计算服务商家，企业化运作，实力雄厚。新睿云从2019年5月29日开启了云服务器秒杀活动，活动时长为期33天。2019年6月1日新睿云秒杀的云服务器方案当中有不错的配置，有兴趣的、特别是有建站需求的朋友可以关注下，2核4G内存、5Mbps带宽、100%性能可用、三年只需1100元。蜗牛手上也拿到了一台绍兴节点的2核4G内存5Mbps带宽方案，文章后面会进行真实测评。

下面列举的是2019年6月1日新睿云三款秒杀云服务器方案，有西安、沈阳、绍兴、东莞、北京五个节点可以选择，均为5Mbps带宽不限流量，其中2核4G内存性价比不错，适合普通建站用途，建站需要强制接入域名稳定，不过商家有免费代稳定服务。

二、新睿云2核4G内存5M云服务器测评

下面测评蜗牛使用的是新睿云绍兴节点真实云服务器产品，配置为2核4G内存、5Mbps带宽。

1、新睿云2核4G内存5M云服务器基本信息测试，E5-2683v4@2.10GHz处理器，VMware架构，已开启BBR优化。

----------------------------------------------------------------------

CPUModel:Intel(R)Xeon(R)CPUE5-2683v4@2.10GHz

CPUCores:2Cores@2099.998MHzx86_64

OS:CentOS7.6.1810(64Bit)VMware

Kernel:5.1.5-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64

TotalRAM:188MB/3921MB(186MBBuff)

LoadAverage:0.49,0.18,0.07

ASN&ISP:AS58461,No.288,Fu-chunRoad

Organization:ChinanetZJSX

Location:ShaoxingXian,China/CN

----------------------------------------------------------------------

2、新睿云2核4G内存5M云服务器硬盘IO测试。169.3MB/s的读写速度相比其他主流云商家要好一点。

----------------------------------------------------------------------

AverageI/OSpeed:169.3MB/s

----------------------------------------------------------------------

3、国内电信、联通、移动上传、下载速度测试。下面的数据不难看出5Mbps上行带宽国内三网基本都是能跑满的，下行基本也能跑到200Mbps以上，带宽方面是非常优秀的。

----------------------------------------------------------------------

NodeNameUploadSpeedDownloadSpeedLatency

Speedtest.net4.40Mbit/s233.99Mbit/s11.241ms

Fast.com0.00Mbit/s1.9Mbit/s-

LianyungangCT4.82Mbit/s231.10Mbit/s-

HangzhouCT3.94Mbit/s235.29Mbit/s-

HefeiCT5.14Mbit/s230.04Mbit/s-

WuhanCT4.57Mbit/s233.58Mbit/s-

ChongQingCT4.73Mbit/s216.53Mbit/s-

LanzhouCT5.72Mbit/s223.88Mbit/s-

KunmingCU5.01Mbit/s210.87Mbit/s-

ChengduCU4.86Mbit/s228.93Mbit/s-

LanzhouCU5.63Mbit/s226.52Mbit/s-

ChongqingCU6.20Mbit/s220.75Mbit/s-

NingxiaCU6.05Mbit/s222.01Mbit/s-

WuhanCU4.78Mbit/s201.63Mbit/s-

HefeiCU4.80Mbit/s217.96Mbit/s-

BeijingCU4.78Mbit/s232.30Mbit/s-

NanjingCU5.10Mbit/s232.70Mbit/s-

ShangHaiCU4.71Mbit/s234.88Mbit/s-

ShanghaiCU5.71Mbit/s232.42Mbit/s-

ChangchunCU4.50Mbit/s227.75Mbit/s-

BeijingCM4.77Mbit/s114.48Mbit/s-

HangzhouCM5.87Mbit/s235.02Mbit/s-

NingboCM4.84Mbit/s234.87Mbit/s-

ShanghaiCM4.55Mbit/s208.82Mbit/s-

ShenyangCM5.62Mbit/s185.99Mbit/s-

KashiCM4.75Mbit/s173.82Mbit/s-

HetianCM5.62Mbit/s192.56Mbit/s-

YiliCM5.12Mbit/s132.81Mbit/s-

LasaCM4.72Mbit/s158.74Mbit/s-

WulumuqiCM5.43Mbit/s154.38Mbit/s-

NanningCM5.46Mbit/s226.85Mbit/s-

LanzhouCM4.45Mbit/s224.86Mbit/s-

----------------------------------------------------------------------

4、新睿云2核4G内存5M云服务器海外节点下载、上传速度测试。

----------------------------------------------------------------------

NodeNameUploadSpeedDownloadSpeedLatency

Speedtest.net4.55Mbit/s21.82Mbit/s12.246ms

Fast.com0.00Mbit/s0.8Mbit/s-

Tokyo,JP4.62Mbit/s44.54Mbit/s-

Osak,JP4.20Mbit/s1.91Mbit/s-

Singapore,SG3.65Mbit/s1.05Mbit/s-

Singapore,SG5.78Mbit/s0.53Mbit/s-

London,UK3.67Mbit/s0.49Mbit/s-

Frankfurt,DE4.22Mbit/s2.48Mbit/s-

Dallas,TX3.57Mbit/s2.24Mbit/s-

Dallas,TX3.24Mbit/s3.60Mbit/s-

Seattle,WA3.72Mbit/s0.22Mbit/s-

Seattle,WA4.54Mbit/s0.70Mbit/s-

HongKong,CN3.32Mbit/s0.25Mbit/s-

Atlanta,GA4.22Mbit/s0.77Mbit/s-

Atlanta,GA3.57Mbit/s0.11Mbit/s-

SanJose,CA6.14Mbit/s2.21Mbit/s-

SanJose,CA3.66Mbit/s0.36Mbit/s-

Washington,WA4.22Mbit/s1.00Mbit/s-

Washington,WA4.02Mbit/s2.21Mbit/s-

Paris,FR,WA4.57Mbit/s1.07Mbit/s-

Paris,FR,WA3.26Mbit/s0.18Mbit/s-

----------------------------------------------------------------------

5、电信、联通、移动线路ping测试结果。

浙江杭州(阿里云)?5.8?毫秒

新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云)?87.7?毫秒

江苏镇江联通?14.8?毫秒

哈尔滨联通?64.2?毫秒

浙江杭州(天翼云)?8.6?毫秒

新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云)?87.7?毫秒

江苏宿迁移动(移动高防G口5000/月@UOVZ)?20.1?毫秒

四川德阳移动?44.3?毫秒

辽宁大连（蓝视云）?48.6?毫秒

吉林长春(天翼云)?69.6?毫秒

山东青岛(天翼云)?20.9?毫秒

天津联通?58.8?毫秒

陕西西安电信（天翼云二区）?27.4?毫秒

新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云)?87.7?毫秒

四川绵阳（明源网络）?37.2?毫秒

贵州黔西南布依族苗族自治州（电信）?71.0?毫秒

湖北武汉(天翼云)?18.8?毫秒

河南洛阳(bgp)?41.8?毫秒

浙江杭州(阿里云)?5.8?毫秒

江苏徐州移动(高防移动)?34.4?毫秒

广州(腾讯云)?22.9?毫秒

海南海口(天翼云)?53.4?毫秒

7、UnixBench跑分测试结果。

------------------------------------------------------------------------

BenchmarkRun:ThuMay30201919:21:38-19:49:46

2CPUsinsystem;running2parallelcopiesoftests

Dhrystone2usingregistervariables49158041.4lps(10.0s,7samples)

Double-PrecisionWhetstone7533.3MWIPS(9.7s,7samples)

ExeclThroughput5576.7lps(30.0s,2samples)

FileCopy1024bufsize2000maxblocks928438.0KBps(30.0s,2samples)

FileCopy256bufsize500maxblocks248324.1KBps(30.0s,2samples)

FileCopy4096bufsize8000maxblocks2889323.8KBps(30.0s,2samples)

PipeThroughput1416865.9lps(10.0s,7samples)

Pipe-basedContextSwitching288554.8lps(10.0s,7samples)

ProcessCreation13375.7lps(30.0s,2samples)

ShellScripts(1concurrent)7875.8lpm(60.0s,2samples)

ShellScripts(8concurrent)1079.9lpm(60.1s,2samples)

SystemCallOverhead1179422.9lps(10.0s,7samples)

SystemBenchmarksIndexValuesBASELINERESULTINDEX

Dhrystone2usingregistervariables116700.049158041.44212.3

Double-PrecisionWhetstone55.07533.31369.7

ExeclThroughput43.05576.71296.9

FileCopy1024bufsize2000maxblocks3960.0928438.02344.5

FileCopy256bufsize500maxblocks1655.0248324.11500.4

FileCopy4096bufsize8000maxblocks5800.02889323.84981.6

PipeThroughput12440.01416865.91139.0

Pipe-basedContextSwitching4000.0288554.8721.4

ProcessCreation126.013375.71061.6

ShellScripts(1concurrent)42.47875.81857.5

ShellScripts(8concurrent)6.01079.91799.9

SystemCallOverhead15000.01179422.9786.3

========SystemBenchmarksIndexScore1608.8